Bank of America

2022

Designing the first deposit: a smarter approach to account activation

New users were successfully opening accounts, but many were not funding them immediately, resulting in lower activation rates, delayed revenue realization and reduced product adoption.

How a new feature turns into more $$$ in the bank for everyone.

Opportunity area

We saw an opportunity to create a dynamic funding module.

Users were presented with options that were sometimes unavailable or poorly explained, leading to hesitation, confusion around transfer timing and fees, and increased drop-off at a pivotal moment. This disconnect between account creation and first deposit limited product adoption and weakened the onboarding journey at its most important stage.

How to solve for:

Problem 1

After opening a new account, many customers stalled at the funding step.

Problem 1

After opening a new account, many customers stalled at the funding step.

Problem 2

The process felt fragmented, options were unclear, and completion rates lagged.

Problem 3

“How might we make funding intuitive, fast, and personalized no matter where customers start?”

Design Strategy

Closing the activation gap

To close the activation gap between account creation and first deposit, the strategy focused on transforming funding from a static list of options into a dynamic, personalized decision experience. The goal was to reduce friction, increase clarity, and guide users confidently through their first deposit.

Surfacing the available options, tailored for the user to pick from and explaining how each works:

Design decision 01

Personalization based on eligibility and availability

Some funding methods were unavailable based on account type, region, or device. The experience lacked prioritization, users didn’t know what to choose. With our Personalization logic, we mapped options to ensure relevance without overwhelming the user.

Confirming and reviewing transfer

Eligibility-Based Personalization.

The system dynamically determined: Account type KYC Status Linked bank presence Regional restrictions Only eligible funding options were displayed.

Funding methods were adapted by device:

Mobile → Apple Pay / instant linking Desktop → Manual bank transfer Native capabilities prioritized when available This reduced dead ends and cross-device friction.

Design decision 02

Transparent education at the point of decision

Users hesitated because they didn’t understand the details and differences of each type of transaction. We re-framed funding from “pick an option” to “choose what works for you.”

Education panel.

Each funding method included:

Clear description

Transfer speed

Fee transparency

Risk/hold explanations

Visual timeline indicators

Ta-dah moment

Designed a module that's reusable, and scalable withing the system.

This ensured consistency, extensibility, and long-term growth support beyond the initial on-boarding flow.

To ensure scalability the funding module is:

Reusable across onboarding and post-onboarding

Built with component-level flexibility

Designed to accommodate future funding methods

Results

This was not simply a UI redesign, but a systems-level intervention within the onboarding ecosystem.

We accounted for backend eligibility logic, cross-platform parity, and compliance requirements while building a modular structure that could scale with future funding methods. By also applying behavioral principles to reduce uncertainty and increase transparency at the activation moment, the feature strengthened the entire onboarding ecosystem , not just a single screen.

The results were clear:

Increased funding completion rate

Improved Day-1 activation

Reduced support tickets related to funding confusion

Enabled faster rollout of new funding methods

Where I would go next

The future is predictive.

I started working on what it would mean to be completely predictive. Looking ahead, I would enhance the experience by introducing predictive default recommendations that surface the most relevant funding option based on user context and behavior. Smart prioritization could dynamically reorder options to reflect likelihood of completion, reducing decision friction. I would also explore progress-based nudges to gently prompt users who begin but do not complete funding, reinforcing momentum without creating pressure.